While I do understand Clarke’s reasoning, issues of gender
almost seem to take a backseat in comparison to the issues of race, and one
reason I concluded this is because the primary arguments focus on comparing
specifically black males against the general population or comparing specifically
black males against white males. However,
the drawbacks that black females face are only briefly mentioned throughout the
reading (for example, the history of immigration of black females and males). Due
to this, Clarke seems to be subconsciously establishing a binary hierarchy
where black males are the dominant binary and the black women are the
weaker/lesser binary. Another reason could be that he includes a lot of personal experiences in this reading, and because of that, simply focuses on the issue from a male perspective.
The data he provides on education versus
employment/unemployment rates, comparing black males against the rest of the
population do strengthen his claims. It also emphasizes the stark reality of
his statement: “A constant interrogation of our belonging inculcates within us”
(434). Perhaps this wound of not belonging is made even rawer by the grim
statistics Clark provides where “Blacks are as well educated as the average
Canadian but suffer higher unemployment (15 percent compared to the Canadian
average of 10 percent…)” (437).
It was particularly
surprising that “83 per cent of Canadians did not know that slavery had been practiced
in pre-Confederation Canada” (434). Perhaps one reason for this is that “The
African-Canadian communities, accounting for only 3 percent of the Canadian
population, will have a more difficult time achieving solidarity than American
Americans, who comprise 13 percent of the American population” (436).
No comments:
Post a Comment