I do agree somewhat with Freud’s id, ego, and superego
theory. Undoubtedly, there have been instances where we have denied ourselves
something that we wanted (id) because we were worried of what others would
think (ego) or because it wasn't the best moral decision (ego). Sometimes, if the id is stronger, we
do let gratification come before our worries of other’s reactions or the right
thing to do. However, I am also in agreement with his critics in their rejection
of sexuality “as the underlying cause of neurosis” (GT 239). I also think Jung’s
“therapeutic use of word-association tests to trigger emotional responses
(which uncovered otherwise hidden neuroses)"would have been more telling than
Freud’s dream analysis (239); mostly because I think how we respond to things or
how we don’t respond to certain things is a lot more telling than interpreting
the dreams that we have. Not to say that interpreting or discussing dreams isn't
of value, for example as we discussed in class, the nightmares of war that
veterans have after coming home from duty is a very telling kind of dream, and
those nightmares/dreams do need to be addressed.
No comments:
Post a Comment